Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Tuman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Douglas Tuman[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable as a failed political candidate, non-notable host of a crypto podcast that is also up for deletion. Oaktree b (talk) 22:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Politics, and United States of America. Oaktree b (talk) 22:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Libertarianism, and New York. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:15, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, seems promotional and sources do not seem enough to support the article. - Indefensible (talk) 01:25, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not notable. Also, related article Monero Talk is currently being AfD'ed too, some relevant discussion is there. Anton.bersh (talk) 11:33, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The related article's Monero Talk AfD just concluded as delete. Anton.bersh (talk) 21:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable in the absence of a properly demonstrated and properly sourced WP:GNG pass for it, but the article is based almost entirely on primary sources that are not support for notability, with virtually no evidence of GNG-building coverage shown at all. Bearcat (talk) 15:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in New York#District 4, as we do with such failed political candidates. A source search did not find anything beyond run-of-the-mill election coverage which is typical of these races. Since the article is so promotional, delete-and-redirect is preferable than just WP:BLAR. Curbon7 (talk) 08:27, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm not seeing enough RS referencing to establish notability. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:08, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:35, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I found only trivial mentions and quotes in the media. Suitskvarts (talk) 15:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.