Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas 'Darien' Walker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tony Fox (arf!) 04:28, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Douglas 'Darien' Walker

Reads like a fan page; advertising and heavily biased. Has no sources, and while i wasn't extremely thorough in attempting to find some, I didn't see any in the usual places you expect this kind of thing to be made out to be notable. Jimmi Hugh (talk) 21:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delete Like the nominator I can't find any notable links or reviews via google, just links from blogs here and there. --Blowdart | ^talk 10:36, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The lack of citations from reliable sources in this article leads me to conclude that the article is not in compliance with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 18:41, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:16, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails NOTABILITY. Kittybrewster ☎ 08:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While I did create the original ThatGuyWithTheGlasses article that was deleted, this article is a mess. Mirrored right from Internet Wikia, I should note as well. --71.183.241.51 (talk) 18:19, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteWhile I really don't want this article deleted,there's no other choice,this guy's not notable enough to be sourced by well known,trusted internet or media sources...--Sammy theeditor (talk) 03:40, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Couldn't find non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.