Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Mark
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:29, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Doug Mark (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lawyer BLP doesn't seem to meet NBIO- subject lacks in-depth coverage, since most independent sources are just WP:PASSING mentions. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:05, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, and New York. Shellwood (talk) 06:33, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:50, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom as written. Notability is not inherited from famous clients any more than from famous family. While the death of the subject's child was tragic, and their memorial effort magnanimous, neither of these facts is a basis for notability either. BD2412 T 03:17, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.