Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Drexel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:21, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Drexel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet notability requirements Eeekster (talk) 01:36, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Violates WP:NOTNEWS and he has never done anything. The person who edited it no longer has a user page. Rin tin tin 1996 (talk) 01:55, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I don't see anything notable. The three references given are non-notable - one just mentions him as a customer of a packaged-cabin company, one is the minutes of a meeting that thanks him for something, and one is thanking him for his part in some memorial service. I can't find any mention of the two films he is claimed to have appeared in. -- Boing! said Zebedee 06:31, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above nn. feydey (talk) 12:14, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - interesting bio, but I don't see how he passes WP:GNG or WP:PROF specifically. Am I missing something? Bearian (talk) 04:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I found a source for him finding a body [1] but doesn't appear to have actually been at the olympics [2] which would have passed WP:ATHLETE. Judging from my searches it appears most of the article is either a hoax or completely unverifiable. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:17, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.