Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doud Eisenhower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy merged into Family of Dwight D. Eisenhower. bd2412 T 20:06, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Doud Eisenhower[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent notability, and nothing that does not belong on his parent’s pages. Qwirkle (talk) 20:54, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:10, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:10, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:10, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:10, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Plenty of detailed coverage means that that the subject passes WP:BASIC. Note also that the Dwight Eisenhower page is tagged as too long and, per WP:SPINOUT, "very large articles should be split into logically separate articles." Andrew D. (talk) 21:29, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:BASIC is, in fact, a strong reason for deletion. DE is famous for a single event, his own death, and the effect that had on his parents.
  Next, this material should not have been spun out of the parents articles to the extent it had been, if this article is correct. Qwirkle (talk) 01:45, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Delete Article should not have been split in the first place, no notability of his own. Coverage is about Dwight's fatherhood, not Doud. If this level of detail and length of quotations is desired, perhaps there should be an "Early life of Dwight D. Eisenhower" article spun out instead. Reywas92^Talk 05:09, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - detailed coverage. Seems to pass WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 10:10, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Create an article at Family of Dwight D. Eisenhower and merge this there. See Family of Barack Obama and Family of Donald Trump for guidance. bd2412 T 02:37, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- ....For one child who died before amounting to anything else?
  No-no-no-ditty-effin-no. Qwirkle (talk)
  - @Qwirkle:, it is apparent that you have completely misunderstood my proposal. I'll start a draft for it. bd2412 T 16:29, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    - No, I understood you perfectly, but I think it is a disservice to the reader. More is not always better. Qwirkle (talk) 19:58, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:53, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge RIP, but no independent notability. Not outright deletion, though, per WP:PRESERVE. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 05:12, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Andrew Davidson, Reywas92, BabbaQ, and John M Wolfson: I have started Draft:Family of Dwight D. Eisenhower, incorporating this information. Is this satisfactory? bd2412 T 18:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Works for me. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 18:53, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.