Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Identity (Haddix novel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:26, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Double Identity (Haddix novel)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references, article has multiple issues. Fails WP:NB. Severe storm 28 02:21, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect the article at Margaret Peterson Haddix should have the Bibliography section expanded to say a little bit about her works like this one. As a standalone article it is just a plot summary. No references (other than the implicit reference to the book itself). User:力 (powera, π, ν) 03:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep [1] [2] ProQuest 211765068 ProQuest 245337855. Maybe stubbify too to get rid of the excess plot summary but that's an ordinary editing action. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 07:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per AleatoryPondering, with additional reviews in Booklist [3] and The Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books [4], meets WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG. DanCherek (talk) 19:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by nominator, it seems like we can keep the article. Severe storm 28 22:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.