Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Shanghai–Pudong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 04:48, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Shanghai–Pudong

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is nothing notable about this hotel and it fails the following requirement per WP:NBUILD: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Wikiwriter700 (talk) 17:14, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:23, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesses-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:23, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:34, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a Skyscraper the building passes WP:GEOFEAT Lightburst (talk) 21:46, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MILL - only 47 stories and is less than 20 years old, this is exactly 51st on the List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Shanghai. Bearian (talk) 21:37, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am not aware of any consensus or precedent that skyscrapers are automatically notable. Generic hotel building low in the city's skyline. Reywas92^Talk 03:49, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete per above, and there is no claim to notability made in the article anyway. Mangoe (talk) 20:11, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.