Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double-Anti-Spy
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:44, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- Double-Anti-Spy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete per WP:PRODUCT; no independent notability. I don't think the publisher of this software meets notability either. FalconK (talk) 20:16, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:26, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - David Gerard (talk) 19:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as essentially a business guide listing, 1 source but that's not nearly enough, nothing else is suggesting better for the needed substance, I certainly found literally nothing. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.