Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dooyong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:04, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dooyong[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough significant coverage found to satisfy WP:CORP. Notability is not inherited from the arcade games they've made. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 16:24, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 16:25, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 16:25, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 16:25, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ,,, as corporate spam. Hey you, yeah you! (talk) 07:45, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - VG:RS custom Google search only returned entries of the company's games on Arcade Museum, and several other misc. entries on that page, but no other significant coverage. --TL22 (talk) 01:19, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.