Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donna Reid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:35, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Donna Reid

WP:POLITICIAN, failed candidate, non-noteable. Timeshift (talk) 13:21, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence that this person has notability beyond unsucessful election, thus she fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:N.--Boffob (talk) 17:18, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, well-established that unsuccessful candidates don't hit the standard. Stifle (talk) 19:59, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. While legislators are inherently notable, Ms. Reid hasn't won office yet. Her article isn't the only one of its kind, by any means; it appears that in 2006, people were using the black-red-blue system to make articles about all the candidates in the Canadian parliamentary election, as demonstrated by Canadian federal election results in Midwestern Ontario. Things have changed in the last couple of years, and a mass nomination would be a good way of reinforcing Wikipedia's policy. Mandsford (talk) 04:14, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge New Democratic Party candidates, 2006 Canadian federal election DoubleBlue (talk) 17:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.