Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donna Barr Tabor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. AustralianRupert (talk) 10:01, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Donna Barr Tabor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:SOLDIER or WP:BIO. Only mentions i can find in Google are one oral history interview, and multiple copies of the same article after her passing. PGWG (talk) 13:55, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. PGWG (talk) 13:56, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I agree. Tragic early death but no indication of notability. I put the notability tag to the article but forgot to follow up with the AFD. Quis separabit? 14:19, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete run of the mill soldier, not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:37, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:GNG - No indication why she is notable. -- Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 11:04, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep pending more information - it would be worth digging in the timeline of women joining the U.S. Army to establish just how early/pioneering she was. "First woman to do X" is notable for being the one to break the glass ceiling. How close was she to the first woman paratrooper I wonder? MurielMary (talk) 10:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Able to answer that myself quite quickly! First woman to graduate from the Basic Airborne was Rita Johnson in Dec 1973. Would like to know how many women there were between Johnson and Tabor. Will continue to investigate. MurielMary (talk) 10:45, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's still nothing at all for independent band and there's certainly nothing new for information. SwisterTwister talk 03:02, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.