Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donkey Kong (Wii)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 18:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Donkey Kong (Wii)[edit]
Only evidence provided is a mere listing in the GameSpot database, with no substantive coverage, which fails Wikipedia:Notability (software). When reliable sources are provided, the article can be recreated. Dancter 19:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to DK Bongo Blast. --70.48.111.77 22:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and do not redirect. It will probably get some reliable sources, but we can delete it until that happens. Do not redirect to the Bongo Blast article- this will just cause confusion when the article is recreated and links have to be fixed. --- RockMFR 23:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball scope_creep 23:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Dancter 00:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT crystal ball. There will be almost certainly a DK Wii game, but until there has been offical announcements all this article can be is speculation. Mitaphane talk 00:52, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Duflpqy 01:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete 1 passing reference inside a 22 page news 'interview' from back in January is not enough. I'm pretty open to the crystal ball when it comes to games if you have something to say but this 'article' is barely a stub. Now if we can see some more information and some cites to show that this is in actual development right now, then I'll quickly change my opinion to keep. Robovski 03:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, without prejudice to recreation when reliable sources make an article viable. — Haeleth Talk 10:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is just a working title for the game which is currently not even in actual development as of this date. I think once any CVG reaches beta testing it is more apporiate to create an article for it. --Pinkkeith 13:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.