Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donita Rose (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. I have found sources and updated the article abit. It will need some work done. Seems to be fine. (non-admin closure) TheDomain (talk) 08:17, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Donita Rose[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable subject. Has been nominated in the past. Has only used one source since 2007. I can see some things on Google but unsure on the sources. If these can be confirmed and fixed for the article then I am happy to withdrawal. First time I have nominated anything for deletion. TheDomain (talk) 21:23, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 March 18. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:41, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 22:38, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 22:38, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing better for WP:ENTERTAINER. SwisterTwister talk 06:17, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There is enough sources for her notability (the likes of ABS-CBN News, Pep, Philippine Star and others) - Supergabbyshoe

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.