Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dong Wenfei

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Once the obvious sock postings are discounted, it's clear there is a consensus to delete this. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:27, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dong Wenfei

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable kickboxer, does not meet WP:KICK Peter Rehse (talk) 15:52, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 15:52, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep It's true he doesn't meet WP:KICK and that the article, if kept, badly needs to be rewritten. However, winning the 2011 Chinese national championship in Sanshou is pretty impressive. You could argue that he might be notable under WP:MANOTE. Papaursa (talk) 01:19, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Oh, no, he is a very famous athletes in Chinese. In Liver Kick, Sherdog, muaythaitv and other sites, can search to his news.WP:KICK Fyfw523 (talk) 08:52, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Being the Chinese sanda champion is nice, but isn't enough to meet WP:KICK. The sources are routine coverage and don't show he meets WP:GNG. Jakejr (talk) 06:23, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ You guys, wait, he will soon meet the WP:KICK condition! Fyfw523 (talk) 21:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It would help if you could explain why your statement is true. Papaursa (talk) 18:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and copy to Fyfw523's sandbox so he/she can work on it there adding as the future events happen the reliable sources that will show that it meets WP:KICK, then reintroducing it as an article. --Bejnar (talk) 17:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That would also allow time to fix what looks like a poor machine translation. It is really badly written.Peter Rehse (talk) 19:16, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Philg88 ^♦talk 04:50, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ You said he did not comply with the WP:KICK is wrong, he is fully compliant with the WP:KICK conditions!! Fyfw523 (talk) 10:01, 7 June 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Clearly not.Peter Rehse (talk) 18:01, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are talking nonsense! (Anger) Fyfw523 (talk) 20:25, 7 June 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

It does not help to vote "keep" repeatedly. --Cold Season (talk) 08:00, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the notability criteria has not been met as stated above. --Cold Season (talk) 08:00, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, No, No, he is completely satisfied the above conditions! Fyfw523 (talk) 09:15, 8 June 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Could you point out how it is established that the topic "completely satisfied the above conditions", because I don't see it and these lack-of-argument (as mentioned earlier) evasive responses are unconvincing. --Cold Season (talk) 22:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Since this fighter has fought both Buakaw and Albert Kraus in WLF, and WLF is indeed considered as a notable event among Albert Kraus's titles, I would suggest to keep his page with proper editation Linusji (talk) 14:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very good! Say well! Best gay friend!! Fyfw523 (talk) 14:15, 9 June 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's now obvious where you stand; do not WP:SOCK. --Cold Season (talk) 06:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do happen to know this contributor through a forum, but my point is still non-biased. Linusji (talk) 19:23, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as notability has not been established. Future performance is not relevant as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Rincewind42 (talk) 15:39, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And neither is it inherited (WP:NOTINHERITED). Who he fought matters less than what was fought for.Peter Rehse (talk) 17:28, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bullshit! Fyfw523 (talk) 03:31, 14 June 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.