Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donatus Edet Akpan
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) (non-admin closure) Reading Beans (talk) 08:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Donatus Edet Akpan[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Donatus Edet Akpan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completing nomination on behalf on an IP. Deletion rationalle (from talk page) The reason for nominating this article for deletion is that there is very little detailed coverage of him in independent references.
Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Nigeria. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:28, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep There seem to be plenty of sources: e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, just from the first 2 pages of a google search. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 14:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Ficaia. Mccapra (talk) 17:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as per the sources identified above so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 17:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as yet another example of what the presumption of notability means: If you can't find sourcing on a Roman Catholic bishop, odds are pretty strong that you simply haven't looked hard enough or in the right places. Jclemens (talk) 20:28, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - sources found by Ficaia demonstrate GNG is met, and therefore the topic is presumed notable. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 00:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep There is quite some info on him in English language to be found on him.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Bishops of major denominations have always been considered to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.