Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Palumbo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:18, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Palumbo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long-term unsourced BLP of questionable notability. Also appears to be autobiographical. The Wordsmith^Communicate 07:07, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:37, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK if deleted: mid-level competent academic, unable to find any hook for notability, cannot find sources to meet WP:GNG. Will reconsider vote if sources are added and I'm notified.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 15:08, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Appears to fail WP:PROF and WP:BIO. I note that people searching under Gnews should beware, as there is a rather famous choirist of the same name, who may actually be a far better candidate for notability. Ray^Talk 00:13, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Ray^Talk 00:14, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep There's an article about this Donald Palumbo's work in Extrapolation, which is apparently a "journal of scholarly study in science fiction and fantasy, featuring critical articles, reviews and bibliographies." And there's another article behind a paywall at the Centre Daily Times. - Dravecky (talk) 01:34, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:43, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not appear to pass WP:PROF. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:19, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.