Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Newton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted as G10 by Versageek. Synergy 08:32, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Donald Newton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The article is an orphan, and writing unknown movie scripts an "imdb trolling" is not notable. NauticaShades 01:35, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- article basically asserts non-notability. Fails WP:BIO by several lightyears. Reyk YO! 01:39, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Umm, yeah. Somehow, I don't think I've seen a single RS'ed claim to fame from an Internet Troll. Jclemens (talk) 02:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. Either this is a biography of a person which does not assert a claim to notability, or an attack page against the subject, or both. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:27, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Nuke Fails utterly at Life, The Universe, and Everything. Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 03:46, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Google and google news turn up no results relevant to him. The page really doesn't suggest why he is notable. I think the page fails human notability criteria. —Atyndall [citation needed] 04:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.