Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Rumsfeld & Dick Cheney In Hell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don Rumsfeld & Dick Cheney In Hell[edit]

Non-notable vanity-press book. Entry seems to have been created by author. Graymornings (talk) 04:09, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a non-notable book failing WP:BK. No points awarded for the COI either Bfigura ^(talk) 04:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There are a couple of user-submitted reviews out there, but I don't think those count as "reliable third-party sources." AnturiaethwrTalk 04:27, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable book. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 05:20, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable book. Possible COI & advertising issues based on creator username and article talk page. Comment I have now notified the author on his usertalk page.Jasynnash2 (talk) 11:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable book. JJL (talk) 14:09, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not notable.--Berig (talk) 17:56, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 09:45, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:BK. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:46, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.