Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominican Brazilian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 03:00, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dominican Brazilian[edit]

Not notable. This article was created by a sockpuppet of a user who creates these "Something-Brazilian" articles with no sources. Many of this users articles are about a non notable communities in Brazil. Lehoiberri (talk) 23:35, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yuk-- another one of these dopey articles based on a line in the Brazilian census. In this case, the author says (without saying why) that there are 100 persons from the Dominican Republic in Brazil. And that doesn't even count the ones who are Dominican monks or who are from Dominica. Idiotic article that has nothing to say and says it. Mandsford (talk) 01:07, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no references. Wapondaponda (talk) 04:40, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No references + no substantive information = no future as an article. I don't even think this article is based on a line from the Brazilian census. The Brazilian census does not ask about ethnic ancestry (unlike, for example, the U.S. census); the only information the Brazilian census would have about Dominican Brazilians would be if the respondent was actually born in the Dominican Republic or previously lived there. [1] Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:19, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is a Dominican-Brazilian Chamber of Commercein Santa Domingo, for what it's worth. Mrmcdonnell (talk) 22:39, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 07:21, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 07:21, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 07:25, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because the article fails to establish the notability of this group of 100 people. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.