Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominic Nuccio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:15, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dominic Nuccio[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nuccio does not WP:CRIME. Vic49 (talk) 22:27, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Vic49 (talk) 22:33, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Vic49 (talk) 22:33, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:CRIME. Not notable, topic notability is about the availability of significant coverage in reliable sources. - DonCalo (talk) 01:37, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 07:39, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Passes WP:CRIME and WP:GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:30, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - There are a bunch (more than a page) of google books search results.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:20, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Electric Catfish 20:39, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:CRIME on both counts. #1: "The victim of the crime is a renowned national or international figure, including, but not limited to, politicians or celebrities". Not true. #2: "The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been considered noteworthy—such that it is a well-documented historic event." Not true. The article's lone reference mentions him only in parentheses as an aside. Of the 12 GBook hits: #1, #7, #8, #10, and #12 are not the subject of this article; #2 and #6 only includes his name in a list of other names; #3, #4, #5, #9, and #11 are fleeting mentions in primary source material. Furthermore, the arrests, trials, and convictions of many people are reported in newspapers worldwide and the consensus of Wikipedians, through the development of WP:CRIME, is that they are not all deserving of articles. For that reason, WP:CRIME and WP:NOTNEWS trump WP:GNG. Location (talk) 23:24, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Chicago Outfit, with no prejudice against a re-creation of an expanded and better referenced article. Cavarrone (talk) 12:02, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would be OK with a redirect. Location (talk) 14:44, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: General non-notablity. --Iconoclast.Horizon (talk) 22:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per the nomination.--Juristicweb (talk) 04:01, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.