Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dom Thompson-Williams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 18:11, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dom Thompson-Williams[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the criteria of WP:NBASE or the previous, more lenient criteria. He never got close to the majors, did not represent his country internationally and was not a particularly highly regarded prospect. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 16:28, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Baseball. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 16:28, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly passes WP:GNG. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:35, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:15, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes GNG with various in-depth articles from a number of third-party reliable sources. JTtheOG (talk) 00:30, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:GNG with the significant coverage already in the article. Failing WP:NBASE is not grounds for deletion and passing it does not mean an article will be kept as WP:NSPORTS, which WP:NBASE is part of, makes it very clear that all sport subjects must pass GNG. Alvaldi (talk) 11:07, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. Ejgreen77 (talk) 10:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per GNG, which makes whether he reached the majors or played internationally irrelevant. Rlendog (talk) 02:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.