Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dom Kane
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Soft Delete. Because of low participation in this discussion will treat the nomination as an expired proposed deletion, with the understanding that anyone who contests the deletion may request undeletion for any reason J04n(talk page) 13:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Dom Kane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence that this person is notable - no serious coverage from reliable third-party sources. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 15:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley (what's up) 00:14, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless sources can be improved - the fact that his work has been played on the radio doesn't, I feel, confer notability. Deb (talk) 12:56, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.