Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dolors Altaba

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus favored deletion as the subject lacked sufficient impact in their field at this time. However, there are other dimension of notability relevant here, such as a local article with substantial coverage, and their documented work as an artist. Taken together, this is pretty close to fulfilling the general notability guideline. If someone would like to recreate this article and has additional sourcing not mentioned here, please contact me, and I will be happy to restore the article. I JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 18:44, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dolors Altaba[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unfortunately I could not find enough up-to-standard sources in any of the relevant fields of activity to demonstrate notability, so I think this must fail WP:NBIO. Ingratis (talk) 23:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Ingratis (talk) 23:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Ingratis (talk) 23:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Ingratis (talk) 23:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I did find some mentions of her books in other books, but no coverage of herself. Fails GNG. Changing vote to Keep as per below. Curiocurio (talk) 02:33, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move to Dolors Altaba-Artal per Works cited. See Google scholar. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 17:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Widely cited author: passes WP:NPROF. pburka (talk) 18:18, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- How are you justifying this "widely cited" claim? Because when I search author:d-altaba-artal on Google Scholar, I see only six publications, with citation counts 42, 11, 2, 2, 0, 0, giving an h-index of 2. This is far far below the usual level of citation needed to pass WP:PROF#C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Low citation counts, one authored book with two reviews, and local-public-library art exhibits don't add up to notability for me, and I can't find anything more than that. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not well-cited enough to pass WP:PROF or well-reviewed enough to pass WP:AUTHOR, and there doesn't seem to be anything else. XOR'easter (talk) 20:13, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:Too soon. No impact on WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:26, 3 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Citations don't meet WP:NPROF, one book isn't going to meet WP:NAUTHOR. She might be notable at some point, but it's WP:TOOSOON. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 13:18, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.