Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doing a parkie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. Sufficiently made up out of nowhere to count as hoax. May also be an attack page. (A7, however, does not apply.) JamesBWatson (talk) 13:51, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doing a parkie[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:RS, seems like a hoax. At best non-notable. SupernovaExplosion (talk) 11:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Hoax, this is not the place to coin phrases one has made up on a boring work day--Lerdthenerd wiki defender 11:41, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Looks sufficiently hoaxy to merit a G3 to me, tagged accordingly. Yunshui 雲‍水 11:42, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as per WP:CSD#A7 - it's almost a Googlewhack (save the "a" in the middle) as it returns one inconsequential hit, doesn't say why on earth this is worth an article. --Ritchie333 (talk) 11:44, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per CSD A7.--Ankit Maity ^TalkContribs 12:17, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For those voting for speedy deletion: A7 only applies to individuals, animals, organizations or web content. This is none of the above, so A7 does not apply. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:53, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.