Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dogs For Kids (magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 05:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dogs For Kids (magazine)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete non-notable magazine. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 00:26, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I know it's hard times for publishing and magazines are often rather transient. However if a closed magazine hasn't generated any real notability so far, it won't be doing it in the future. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:34, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 04:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.