Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dog Eat Dog (2001 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 02:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dog Eat Dog (2001 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. No critic reviews or other significant coverage. Lennart97 (talk) 21:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 21:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:15, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:15, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Found these reviews (1), 2) straight away. Probably a lot more based on who's in the cast. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:17, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I should have been able to find those. I've found this one, too. It does seem to me, however, that these reviews are not quite the full-length reviews by nationally known critics that WP:NFILM requires, nor does the film meet any of NFILM's other criteria. Lennart97 (talk) 09:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep the definition of a nationally known critic as agreed by the Wiki Project Film is that the critic writes for a national publication of a sizeable circulation so the BBC certainly qualifies and the critic Jamie Russell is termed at Rotten Tomatoes as a top critic. TimeOut is also a major publication but the review is on the short side so it's a weak keep imv, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Enough coverage and notable enough cast for notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.