Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doe test

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Doe test

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability. The only link to this page on Wikipedia is a See Also section, with little context to the rest of the article. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 13:21, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland -related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 13:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation -related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 13:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The title which covers this subject isn't especially notable. Nor, in honesty, would it seem to be the correct/common title anyway (The "DOE Test" would seem to be more commonly called the "CVRT Test" for some time). However it is known, the subject can easily be covered under another title (perhaps as a section under the Road Safety Authority article. As the agency which oversees the commercial vehicle testing regime). Otherwise the subject wouldn't seem to need its own article/title. (If there is any salvagable content, then a summary of it could be moved/addressed in the RSA article. ANd this title and its content deleted. A redirect would seem unnecessary). Guliolopez (talk) 12:01, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. After over a decade, article remains unreferenced. The term is no longer in use and the unreferenced content is also out of date. Britishfinance (talk) 01:38, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note. I just placed a request for this discussion to be close here. Thank you all! ―Matthew J. Long -Talk-^☖ 21:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.