Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Wooreddy's Prescription for Enduring the Ending of the World
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The Nordic Goddess Kristen Worship her 00:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Doctor Wooreddy's Prescription for Enduring the Ending of the World[edit]
- Doctor Wooreddy's Prescription for Enduring the Ending of the World (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Notability, while the article meets some of the threshold standards of Wikipedia:Notability (books) with an ISBN and available in the National Library of Australia it doesnt meet the basic criteria of being subject to multiple independent reviews, recieved any literary awards, motion picture etc, or a subject of instruction. The author Mudrooroo Nyoongah, got a state award 10 years after the book he doesnt appear to offer any inheritance value to this article. Gnangarra 14:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Gnangarra 14:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. 14 pages of this book are devoted to the subject, and there's more coverage here, here, here and in loads more books and scholarly articles. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per User:Phil Bridger above, and offer a friendly suggestion that the nominator check Google Books before nominating; often there will be good sources on there that are not in the regular Google web index. Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Keep. Clearly meets the notability criteria per the sources found by Phil Bridger. --J.Mundo (talk) 05:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.