Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Do Go On (podcast)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:11, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do Go On (podcast)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim of notability, no reliable sources to demonstrate notability either. Google search showed virtually no independent sites mentioning this podcast. Cahk (talk) 09:34, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To address the issue of notability, I included a link to the itunes charts of Britain and Australia on the page: http://www.itunescharts.net/artists/podcast/matt-stewart-jess-perkins-dave-warneke/podcasts/do-go-on/ Additionally, the Do Go On podcast is included here, in a Melbourne Comedy Festival booking website: https://www.trybooking.com/book/event?eid=252377 Both of these sources are in the page's references list. Finally, in you click the link to the talk page, I go more in depth into this discussion. I wrote it before I read your comment, so not all of it may apply (mostly I want to know why this is nominated for deletion but not other, shorter and less relevant, articles)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:53, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Falls well short of WP:GNG. Web search revealed no further sources which would support a claim of notability. --Jack Frost (talk) 12:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability Nick-D (talk) 09:47, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.