Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dlokcuc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G3 vandalism. JohnCD (talk) 15:31, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dlokcuc[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably hoax. Possible copyvio of http://www.dictiome.com/en/93367/Apophis-pronunciation-Aussprache-prononciation-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5-pronunciaci%C3%B3n. As far as I can tell, it's just been copied form there with the name changed. I can't find any evidence that an Egyptian deity of this name exists. Adam9007 (talk) 00:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. APerson (talk!) 02:04, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Speedy Delete - It may be moot anyway... the text has been hidden due to copyvio, but even without seeing the text, I can tell that "Dlokcuc" is "Cuckold" spelled backwards, and is thus almost certainly WP:BOLLOCKS. I did double check with some googling to make sure... coincidences between languages do happen, but... no. Fieari (talk) 02:37, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: Duplicates Apep (CSD A10), Vandalism (CSD G3), Copyvio (CSD G12). —MRD2014 (formerly Qpalzmmzlapq) T C 11:48, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.