Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Djamil Suherman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 21:19, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Djamil Suherman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Someone tagged this with {{db-bio}}, which was subsequently removed. It is not obvious to me what makes this poet notable. Has no reliable sources, and I cannot verify if any of those publications are real or not self published. -- Selket ^Talk 08:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

KeepThis would indicate they are real and probably not self published, given that he has three books in the National Library of Australia. This source mentions the author and his works as an example of his genre (it is written in Indonesian). This, also translated, seems like a good source indicating notability. Given Wikipedia's WP:BIAS against third world and non-English biographies and topics, I think these sources indicate a strong enough level of notability.--TM 12:55, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:14, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.