Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Division of Afghanistan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. czar ⨹ 02:23, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Division of Afghanistan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an essay about an abandoned idea from 2 years ago as the UK troops were pulling out. It misrepresents both the idea and the sources - it was NEVER about the language. EBY (talk) 16:35, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Actually, the misrepresentation looks like a SYNTH of the abandoned idea from 2 years ago and a think piece from 40 years ago. EBY (talk) 16:36, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Essay - opinion and original research. --MelanieN (talk) 01:20, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:57, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - "vanity, vanity, all is vanity." This is the ultimate essay of unfulfilled think tank dreams. Bearian (talk) 01:22, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.