Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divine Master's Shrine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:19, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Divine Master's Shrine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage - fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GEOFEAT. Divine Master's Shrine is mentioned in Philippine Benevolent Missionaries Association -no point to merge or redirect. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 14:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The information is already covered at Ruben Ecleo. Since they're inextricably linked, I don't think it helps readers to have a separate article, unless and until it becomes so lengthy that it needs to be split off. Mortee (talk) 17:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have since updated and added references as well more information about the site. ( (Dinagat Islander (talk) 02:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Weak delete - The site looks like it would be suitable for inclusion, but I cannot find any non-primary sources about it, which mean that the article can only represent the non-neutral point of view of the sites mantainers. I also have verifiability concerns which are rather important for a tourist site; for instance, I don't see a reliable source for what the gardens are like, for the tourist information provided, etc, and providing unreliable information about a public or tourist sites is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Smmurphy^(Talk) 20:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.