Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divine Food

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 23:31, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Divine Food[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidenc of meeting WP:NFILM or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 14:32, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Film year:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Festivals:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Television:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Filmmaker:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Topic:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long title:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep Meets WP:NF's other attributes section as it is still screening at festivals more than five years after initial release, IE: 1998 [1][2], 2006 [3], 2008 [4], and as recently as 2013 [5][6] and has received some decent reviews: [7] and [8][9]. Yes, this will never get the coverage of some big-budget, major studio blockbuster, but for what it is, it is just notable enough for Wikipedia. Needs use of available sources, but addressable issues are rarely cause for deletion. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:24, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:24, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 01:00, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per MichaelQSchmidt's spot on analysis - Needs some TLC. –Davey2010 • (talk) 02:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 01:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per MichaelQSchmidt's Excellent analysis and passes WP:NF#Other evidence of notability .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:41, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw vomination I'm convinced by the excellent comments above. Boleyn (talk) 06:37, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.