Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divine Exchange

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:55, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Divine Exchange[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent notability shown for this album. Unsourced and little more than a track listing. I found nothing with significanct coverage of this album Nothing satisfying WP:NALBUM. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 14:35, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable and I haven't found any Billboard listings aside from what appears to be an irrelevant result. However, there is a BBC news article here, that mentions the album and church once. As I've mentioned at other AfDs, it is not surprising that a religion music album would've received little to no news coverage, and if any, it would be insignificant. SwisterTwister talk 22:17, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.