Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dive Pretzel Coaster
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G7 at author's request. JohnCD (talk) 19:00, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Dive Pretzel Coaster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Roller coaster does not yet exist. Unlike other articles for future roller coasters, there is no definitive proof in reliable sources to indicate it ever will exist. The bulk of the sourcing refers to a planned development that never materialized, and the rest uses a known rumor site and an original interpretation of a news article's terminology. As it stands now, this doesn't meet notability standards. McDoobAU93 02:44, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As nominator. --McDoobAU93 03:01, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- There is proof, in The Star newspaper mentiones a "Pretzel Coaster", RCDB does as well (it lists The Star article as well). The refs that refer to Orlando Thrill Park should have no influence on weather this article gets deleted because they are newspaper's (reliable) and they include evidence that this type of coaster was supposed to be built (there's a reason why its in the history section).--Dom497 (talk) 02:50, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- <redacted> --Canoe1967 (talk) 02:51, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- ^What does that have to do with this at all?--Dom497 (talk) 02:53, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It is another build that has yet to start construction, and yet it survives well here.--Canoe1967 (talk) 02:59, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Keep calm and carry on. --McDoobAU93 03:01, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It is another build that has yet to start construction, and yet it survives well here.--Canoe1967 (talk) 02:59, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- ^What does that have to do with this at all?--Dom497 (talk) 02:53, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- <redacted> --Canoe1967 (talk) 02:51, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:24, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:24, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been notified to WikiProject Amusement Parks. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:24, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.