The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Owen×☎ 20:48, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Taged as Speedy for Promotional but its not a speedy nor promotional.Placing it here instead. No Vote --JAranda | watz sup 22:14, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep in development since 2000, and running on >15 servers. -DDerby-(talk) 18:32, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
