Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disputes in French grammar and spelling
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 05:27, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Disputes in French grammar and spelling[edit]
- Disputes in French grammar and spelling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
poor sourcing, unencyclopedic style, little content Makerowner 03:52, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- DeleteIt's just a list of common errors in French usage, rather trivial ones at that. An article about real usage controversies in French --the feminisation of titles, spelling reform, anglicisms-- would be well worth writing; but this isn't it.Rhinoracer 12:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. These are mistakes, not controversial issues. JJL 15:37, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- COMMENT-- I "voted" above to delete, but upon reflection I am unsure. The subject itself seems to be encyclopedic, the execution is incompetent. However, is that a criterion for WP:AFD ?
I don't think so, and thus I change my judgement to NEUTRAL. However, if this article survives the AFD process, it will need very extensive work to bring it up to encyclopedic standards. I encourage the article's creators to contact me on my homepage. Rhinoracer 20:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - a list of common spelling mistakes in French? No. Very misleading article title, by the way. Otto4711 15:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.