Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney Princess Enchanted Tales
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Disney Princess Enchanted Tales: Follow Your Dreams. SoWhy 21:34, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Disney Princess Enchanted Tales[edit]
- Disney Princess Enchanted Tales (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unnotable future film release with no actual release date; even with a release, this is not a notable direct to DVD release. Fails WP:N and WP:NFF. The two "references" are a blog and a licensing magazine article. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - WP:CRYSTAL. When it is actually released, we can talk about notability (in which case, I would probably vote for a merge/redirect to Disney Princess, where it already has a section). DARTH PANDAduel 20:00, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with the first Enchanted Tales film article. The article currently states that production has been cancelled, therefore there is no need for an article. However the fact a sequel was planned and cancelled (and there are sources cited) is worth adding to the previous film's article in a "Cancelled sequel" section. 23skidoo (talk) 22:52, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect. (also makes a good search term for being partial title of existing film) Skidoo is right, the fact it was announced and cancelled should be covered in the main article.- Mgm|(talk) 09:44, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge: This would make a nice merge Ryan4314 (talk) 00:48, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.