Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney Fab 50 Character Collection
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Disney Fab 50 Character Collection[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Disney Fab 50 Character Collection (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Few reliable sources in the article, nothing found via WP:BEFORE. No good redirect target. (Oinkers42) (talk) 14:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 October 4. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:46, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disney-related deletion discussions. (Oinkers42) (talk) 14:58, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Amusement parks-related deletion discussions. (Oinkers42) (talk) 14:58, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. (Oinkers42) (talk) 14:58, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:03, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete or Merge — The information is probably worth a mention where these statues are located in the history section of Disneyland or Disney World. Not worth a standalone article. Adog (Talk・Cont) 14:14, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Per above reasons as stated by Adog, this article does not signify importance worthy of a standalone article.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.