Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney-Pixar Studios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:38, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disney-Pixar Studios[edit]

Yes, Disney bought Pixar yesterday...and baby Jesus wept. However, there was no mentioning of ay name changing or new names for any studios; the particulars of the deal have not even been all worked out yet. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. FuriousFreddy 01:43, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. per nom. hateless 01:51, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. 69.231.248.250 04:53, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ruby 02:00, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ikkyu2 02:10, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Bwithh 02:14, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Brokenfrog 03:06, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 03:47, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article which started this page stated that Ed Catmull will serve as president of the new Pixar and Disney animation studios. This was interpreted to be a new combination studio: ie: "Pixar and Disney animation studios". This is likely to be false, as the statement is ended with studios. It most likely refers to Pixar animation studio and Disney animation studio, as the article in question stated that the main point in the negotiations was that Pixar would retain it's current identity seperate of Disney. MetaFox 05:34, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.