Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disciple (Image Comics)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to List of Spawn characters. (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 17:28, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disciple (Image Comics)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Alongside the likes of Freak Force this article should be deleted it has no reliable third person sources to demonstrate its notability. Dwanyewest (talk) 12:37, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 May 3. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 12:49, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 15:17, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Spawn characters. No sources have been provided at all, much less independent sources. If someone wants to create a properly sourced article later, they will be able to find this version in the article history if they need it as a reference. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:27, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Spawn characters. Unsourced, no claim to notability, and written entirely from an in-universe perspective.--NukeofEarl (talk) 13:04, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.