Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disability etiquette

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 16:07, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disability etiquette

Fails WP:NOT, specifically WP:IINFO. Leonard^(Bloom) 02:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This is taken from here [1].--Crossmr (talk) 02:59, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Definitely WP:IINFO--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 03:37, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I didn't create this article--it's from the old days of Cliff's software before all the history was kept, and my edit just happens to be the first one kept. --LDC (talk) 06:14, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia isn't an etiquette handbook. Movingboxes (talk) 06:48, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A somewhat unusual vote ... Delete then Replace While the content of this article is clearly deletion-worthy, the subject of "Disability etiquette" (but with a better title) is worthy of inclusion, isn't it? It's a well-known concept, and there's lots of material out there that could be used as the basis for an encyclopaedic article on the subject. SP-KP (talk) 11:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A howto essay. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 13:03, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because you cannot write essays or the like on Wikipedia. I think this is good for WP:SNOW. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 05:48, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.