Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disability Symptoms
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 13:46, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disability Symptoms[edit]
- Disability Symptoms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is WP:OR and has no WP:RS Basket of Puppies 02:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unreferenced original research per nom. WWGB (talk) 02:37, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- So what? That can change, and the topic of Disability Symptoms is notable. Strong KeepHello, My Name Is SithMAN8 (talk) 05:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Original research, unreferenced....I would think that such a broad topic as symptoms of disability would be unlikely to fit in a single article. With this in mind, we don't need this article or any other article with this name, so delete. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 06:11, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per WP:NOT#ESSAY and WP:NOT#OR, just like every other article this editor has created to date. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 01:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Try snd comment on the article not the creator Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 02:02, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply to the mention of WP:BITE:
- My !vote was based on WP:NOT#ESSAY and WP:NOT#OR—which are about the article.
- He created his account over 18 months ago—at what point isn't he a newbie anymore?
- In that time period, this editor has created (at least) six new articles. Two have been deleted (one speedy, one AFD) and the other four are all currently up for AFD (the others can be found here, here, and here). These articles all have identical problems—they're essays without references.
- His user page was recently deleted for being advertising (which makes it seven, I guess).
- I'm a big believer in WP:AGF, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't notice trends. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 20:24, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.