Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Directorate of Economic Intelligence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Directorate of Economic Intelligence[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Kontrola (creator) with the following rationale "additional info". The additional info added was just some copyediting for interlinks, etc. The article still lacks sources that would show that the company is notable. There are no mentions in press or books about it, and even the crappy metric of Google Hits is <1000 when looking for Polish name. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 23:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. Topic does not appear to be notable. References fail WP:RS. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 21:23, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Xaxing (talk) 06:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - does not meet WP:GNG and as per nom. Xaxing (talk) 06:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: An article on a Polish firm, whose article on the Polish Wikipedia was deleted after a similar AfD in November 2015. AllyD (talk) 13:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 13:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article on a company whose text and references do not establish its encyclopaedic notability. Nor do my searches (on the English name, which is shared with other concerns, and the more likely Polish name) identify anything to suggest more than a company going about its business. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 14:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.