Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dipreco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete, author requests deletion. Morgan Wick 05:11, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dipreco[edit]

Delete as yet another constructed language someone made up in their spare time. No notability. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 04:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know the person who created this language, and I am wondering why the article is being deleted.

It has citations and everything.
Ucryc wasn't deleted.
-- Ninfreak08 | Talk | 4:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Delete So NN it isn't even funny. Hobbeslover ^{talk/contribs} 04:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you Ninfreak08 for pointing me to that article. I shall now nominate it for AfD as well. As for the deletion, the language is not notable in any way, shape, or form. That's about it. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 04:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Sorry all for creating these articles. I am the creator of the Dipreco article and the Ucryc article. I would like to ask that they both be deleted.

Thank you and sorry. -- Ninfreak08 | Talk | 04:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.