Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dino Geromella
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 18:34, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Dino Geromella[edit]
- Dino Geromella (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No real claim of notability. Transient media coverage due to a minor 2012 controversy, but other than that, nothing substantial that would count towards WP:GNG. GregorB (talk) 18:23, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Badly written to the point it is close to be nuked, but the main problem is it does not assert notability, which seems to be based on some minor WP:ONEEVENT. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 19:19, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:ONEEVENT, other coverage is not substantial. Daß Wölf 16:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.