Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dimethylsulfidemia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The article has been userfied to User:Lesion/Dimethylsulfidemia for the purpose of merging any relevant content to the halitosis article as the author suggested below. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:49, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dimethylsulfidemia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contains OR. Rest of content would be better presented on the halitosis page Lesion (talk) 18:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Clearly a notable article, if it contains OR tag it as such or edit it, doesn't deserve deletion. ChessFiends (talk) 18:08, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:11, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote this page when I first joined wikipedia, before I understood rules regarding OR... I can confirm it does contain OR and what little that can be salvaged could easily be incorporated into the halitosis page. I am happy to do this. Also the nature of some of the references does not meet WP:MEDRES. Someone argued for its deletion when it was created, and I argued against them but now I agree it needs to be deleted. No others were involve in the debate at that time since it was not tagged for deletion. Lesion (talk) 18:17, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as OR and poorly sourced per nom; confirmed and agreed by original author, who is also the primary editor. -- Scray (talk) 19:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, there is no such an entity as "Dimethylsulfidemia", do a search in medline.[1].Kiatdd (talk) 09:57, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As per request by original author. 1292simon (talk) 13:41, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 10:49, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.