Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dime (slang)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. howcheng {chat} 06:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dime (slang)

Unrefenced, ~~delete~~--Greatestrowerever 21:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC) (references now added)--Greatestrowerever 21:34, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I created the page at 20:59 and you tagged it at 21:01. How about 24 hours to finish putting it together before you try and take it down. Look at my work. I usually do good stuff. I just got my first WP:FA and WP:FL this month. Give me a fair chance to pull the page together. As noted in the edit summary, I am creating this to augment Dime in support of Dime (United States coin) which is coming up for WP:TFA on April 10th. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 21:13, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I suggest you augment the article with a {{wiktionary}} tag. Dmcdevit·t 06:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:21, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, that's a whole 2 minutes! Transwiki to wiktionary; it looks a dicdef me, even if a nice and detailed one. Tizio 13:30, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked the new version of the article, and it is still a dictionary definition to me. I have no problem in letting it stay here for some time (at least, it's a good dictdef), just I can't see how that can change it from being better suited for Wiktionary. Tizio 12:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki to Wiktionary as a (well-written) dicdef, though it was incorrect of the nom to tag it for deletion while it was clearly under construction. Krimpet (talk/review) 18:07, 2 April 2007 (UTC) Keep to give the article more time to be developed and referenced first, then we can see whether it's a candidate for transwiki or not. Krimpet (talk/review) 19:24, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree the the wiki definition should be augmented with slang uses. However, WP has a place for slang terms. Come back after I augment the page a bit. Maybe it should be listified as a List of slang uses of the term Dime, but I think WP has a place for this article. Again, reconsider after I have put this together. As an aside, when I do new page patrol, I go back 10000 edits which is over 4 days because I don't think you should hassle people until after they have had a chance to cleanup their work. You are already pigeon holing this into Wiktionary. I think this will make a decent list when I get through. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 18:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This article is on the way to being more than a dicdef, and that it is careless to tag it this soon after creations. Nothing that is not absolutely obvious nonsense (etc) should be tagged that soon. DGG 03:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki and delete. Any article that begins with "Dime is a term with multiple slang meanings." is about solely word meanings, and not the encyclopedic concept behind the word's referent. The sections, "Usage"s are just more definition material. See WP:WINAD. Just because there are many definiteions does not make it encyclopedic. If you are planning a list of definitions, note that those are not encyclopedic either, as Wikipedia is WP:NOT#DICT "dictionary definitions" or "Lists of such definitions. " Dmcdevit·t 06:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This article is far beyond anything that's appropriate for a straight transwiki to Wiktionary, and its extensive encyclopedic portions would be deleted in the process.--Father Goose 07:17, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.