Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilshan TG (YouTuber)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 10:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dilshan TG (YouTuber)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP: ANYBIO, lacks significant coverage in any reliable sources. Appears to be self promotion and clear WP:COI. Dan arndt (talk) 10:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 10:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 10:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 11:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I found nothing from searching. YouTubers with 50K subscribers typically aren't notable. ColinBear (talk) 12:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I don't see how he is notable.--Mvqr (talk) 12:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable youtube creator. Unreliable sourcing. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 14:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also created by single-purpose account. Could very easily be an autobiography. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 14:59, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.